Methodology

The CHRB’s Pilot Methodology is the result of extensive multi-stakeholder consultation around the world over two years, involving representatives from over 400 companies, governments, civil society organisations, investors, academics and legal experts.

""

The 2017 Pilot Benchmark provides the first-ever comparative snapshot of the human rights performance of the largest 98 companies across the agricultural products, apparel and extractives industries. The companies were selected on the basis of their size (market cap) and revenues. View companies here.

Launched in March 2016, the CHRB Pilot Methodology is the product of over two years of development through multi-stakeholder consultation with over 400 organisations. See consultation feedback

The CHRB Pilot Methodology 2016 was amended by the Methodology Addendum. The CHRB Full Combined Pilot Methodology combines the Pilot Methodology and Addendum.

Cover.png

Download the Full Combined Pilot Methodology 

Grounded in international and industry-specific standards on human rights and responsible business conduct, the 2017 Benchmark focuses on companies’ policies, processes, practices, as well as how they respond to serious allegations. This is done through the application of 100 indicators across 6 Measurement Themes of different weights.  

In its application, the Pilot Methodology relies on public information disclosed by companies on their websites, other platforms, or through the CHRB Disclosure Platform. The CHRB then uses that public information in its assessments to produce a transparent benchmark as a public good.

Comparability is a key feature of the Benchmark, to discern the best performers and those requiring improvement and intervention. The CHRB seeks to offer comparability in many different ways: across industries; within industries; by measurement theme; and ultimately over time.  

Pilot Methodology Addendum

As a first of its kind methodology, the CHRB anticipated that changes to certain indicators or their interpretation would likely be required to ensure the learnings of the research and application phase were incorporated. As anticipated, this was confirmed during the initial research phase of applying the Pilot Methodology (May – October 2016), with several indicators requiring adjustment to ensure fairness and rigour in the results. Similarly, during the subsequent engagement phase with companies on their draft scores (November – December 2016), a further number of indicators were identified as requiring adjustments in their interpretation and application. 

This “in-flight” review has provided the CHRB the valuable opportunity of learning from the research, engagement, and application of the Pilot Methodology to real-time contexts and scenarios. These in-flight changes were presented to the companies being benchmarked and representatives of civil society in December 2016. Receiving no objections, these changes were adopted and implemented during the review phase of the Pilot findings (December – February 2017). These changes are presented in the Pilot Methodology Addendum, which should be read in conjunction with the full CHRB Pilot Methodology. The CHRB Full Combined Pilot Methodology combines the Pilot Methodology and Addendum.

 

Following the March 2017 launch of the Benchmark, the Pilot Methodology will be refined to reflect the learnings of the Pilot and strengthen the Benchmark for future iterations. Ultimately, the CHRB will be produced each year following an annual research cycle.